<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for worrbase</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.worrbase.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.worrbase.com</link>
	<description>Highlighting the thrilling adventures of William Orr</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 12:40:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on OpenBSD pf vs Linux iptables: A Comparison by Sunner</title>
		<link>http://www.worrbase.com/2009/11/14/openbsd-pf-vs-linux-iptables-a-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 12:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worrbase.com/?p=12#comment-60</guid>
		<description>TeKKen, based on your comments I take it you haven&#039;t used OpenBSD in about 7-8 years or more? It hasn&#039;t used IPF since version 2.9, which is nearing a decade old, and PF has had the NAT functionality built in since 3.2 or so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TeKKen, based on your comments I take it you haven&#8217;t used OpenBSD in about 7-8 years or more? It hasn&#8217;t used IPF since version 2.9, which is nearing a decade old, and PF has had the NAT functionality built in since 3.2 or so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on OpenBSD pf vs Linux iptables: A Comparison by worr</title>
		<link>http://www.worrbase.com/2009/11/14/openbsd-pf-vs-linux-iptables-a-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>worr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 07:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worrbase.com/?p=12#comment-48</guid>
		<description>What I said there was a little ambiguous. I&#039;ll edit it later today for clarity.

What I meant was that packets that are part of an existing connection are passed through your iptables rules. When pf passes (or blocks) the beginning of a new connection, it will continue to do the same action upon those packets without passing them through the ruleset.

Thanks for pointing that out.

Additionally, pf has NAT built in.

Also, pf can log to pflog, which is a binary file read with tcpdump. If you want to log in plaintext, you can log to syslog as well. Since it&#039;s built in to pf, it&#039;s faster than loading the ulogd iptables extension.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I said there was a little ambiguous. I&#8217;ll edit it later today for clarity.</p>
<p>What I meant was that packets that are part of an existing connection are passed through your iptables rules. When pf passes (or blocks) the beginning of a new connection, it will continue to do the same action upon those packets without passing them through the ruleset.</p>
<p>Thanks for pointing that out.</p>
<p>Additionally, pf has NAT built in.</p>
<p>Also, pf can log to pflog, which is a binary file read with tcpdump. If you want to log in plaintext, you can log to syslog as well. Since it&#8217;s built in to pf, it&#8217;s faster than loading the ulogd iptables extension.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google App Engine, Twitter4J and OAuth by Carsten</title>
		<link>http://www.worrbase.com/2010/03/13/google-app-engine-twitter4j-and-oauth/comment-page-1/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Carsten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 07:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worrbase.com/?p=18#comment-47</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m doing the exact same thing. ;-) After trying to build Twitter4j it was pretty easy to authenticate with Twitter, but I messed up my callback, so the user got an authentication error every now and then.

I&#039;ll rewrite my code using your methods as a guide. Thanks for this post! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m doing the exact same thing. <img src='http://www.worrbase.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  After trying to build Twitter4j it was pretty easy to authenticate with Twitter, but I messed up my callback, so the user got an authentication error every now and then.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll rewrite my code using your methods as a guide. Thanks for this post! <img src='http://www.worrbase.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on OpenBSD pf vs Linux iptables: A Comparison by TeKKen</title>
		<link>http://www.worrbase.com/2009/11/14/openbsd-pf-vs-linux-iptables-a-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>TeKKen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 08:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worrbase.com/?p=12#comment-46</guid>
		<description>&quot;With iptables, all of your packets pass through all of your rules&quot;

Is this a fact? I don&#039;t think so.
I built freebsd ipfw based firewalls + linux iptables and there isn&#039;t much difference with the current 4/8/16 core hardwares...

IPF lacks in many features what linux iptables have one of them is layer7 filtering which is great if you build QoS gateways where you want to give more priority for latency sensitive apps and less for file transfer apps.

ULOGd in linux is just very nice too , I&#039;m not sure if this is available in bsd.

NAT is another good compact thing in iptables when you have to run, configure separate natd on bsd. 

&quot;pf, you can change tables, variables, lists and anchors on the fly&quot;
After an FW setup properly I hardly ever touch it so this is irrelevant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;With iptables, all of your packets pass through all of your rules&#8221;</p>
<p>Is this a fact? I don&#8217;t think so.<br />
I built freebsd ipfw based firewalls + linux iptables and there isn&#8217;t much difference with the current 4/8/16 core hardwares&#8230;</p>
<p>IPF lacks in many features what linux iptables have one of them is layer7 filtering which is great if you build QoS gateways where you want to give more priority for latency sensitive apps and less for file transfer apps.</p>
<p>ULOGd in linux is just very nice too , I&#8217;m not sure if this is available in bsd.</p>
<p>NAT is another good compact thing in iptables when you have to run, configure separate natd on bsd. </p>
<p>&#8220;pf, you can change tables, variables, lists and anchors on the fly&#8221;<br />
After an FW setup properly I hardly ever touch it so this is irrelevant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Formspring.me API beta by Geoff Hotchkiss</title>
		<link>http://www.worrbase.com/2010/06/03/formspring-me-api-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff Hotchkiss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 22:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worrbase.com/?p=40#comment-45</guid>
		<description>The major problem in your code is that you&#039;re writing Perl :-/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The major problem in your code is that you&#8217;re writing Perl :-/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on LTSP by Drew Stephens</title>
		<link>http://www.worrbase.com/2010/04/22/ltsp/comment-page-1/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew Stephens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 14:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worrbase.com/?p=32#comment-33</guid>
		<description>Awesome to hear something new in the user center—hopefully this will keep more of the machines in working condition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome to hear something new in the user center—hopefully this will keep more of the machines in working condition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on LTSP by Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.worrbase.com/2010/04/22/ltsp/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 11:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worrbase.com/?p=32#comment-32</guid>
		<description>Any luck getting physical ports forwarded?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any luck getting physical ports forwarded?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on mars_nwe and the Great IPX Battle: Part I by worr</title>
		<link>http://www.worrbase.com/2009/11/06/mars_nwe-and-the-great-ipx-battle-part-i/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>worr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 04:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worrbase.com/?p=11#comment-21</guid>
		<description>So about that. I never got around to working with it again, and I&#039;ve got another big project to deal with. However, it will probably work if you can grab an older version of glibc (probs from oldstable). That might work. I need to play with it again, and if you want I might be able to get to it in the next week or so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So about that. I never got around to working with it again, and I&#8217;ve got another big project to deal with. However, it will probably work if you can grab an older version of glibc (probs from oldstable). That might work. I need to play with it again, and if you want I might be able to get to it in the next week or so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on mars_nwe and the Great IPX Battle: Part I by netnotwork_guy</title>
		<link>http://www.worrbase.com/2009/11/06/mars_nwe-and-the-great-ipx-battle-part-i/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>netnotwork_guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 03:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worrbase.com/?p=11#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Did you ever get this working?  I have a mission critical system at my company that is about 18 years old and will only connect to NetWare file shares.  Maintaining the old Netware server to keep this thing running, and trying to make modern systems &quot;play nice&quot; with it, is causing terrible issues and takes a huge amount of my time.  In all my searches I am yet to read of someone successfully emulating a netware file server with debian or any free and open source distro.  I would be willing to do testing and bug reporting if someone has the development ability to make mars_nwe work on debian.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you ever get this working?  I have a mission critical system at my company that is about 18 years old and will only connect to NetWare file shares.  Maintaining the old Netware server to keep this thing running, and trying to make modern systems &#8220;play nice&#8221; with it, is causing terrible issues and takes a huge amount of my time.  In all my searches I am yet to read of someone successfully emulating a netware file server with debian or any free and open source distro.  I would be willing to do testing and bug reporting if someone has the development ability to make mars_nwe work on debian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on OpenBSD pf vs Linux iptables: A Comparison by Chris Lockfort</title>
		<link>http://www.worrbase.com/2009/11/14/openbsd-pf-vs-linux-iptables-a-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Lockfort</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 14:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.worrbase.com/?p=12#comment-6</guid>
		<description>http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-pf/2007-May/003299.html

Step 1: Download GeoIP data.
Step 2: Regex.
Step 3: pfctl yourself some new tables into memory
Step 4: Cronjob it
Step 5: ???
Step 6: Profit</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-pf/2007-May/003299.html" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-pf/2007-May/003299.html?referer=');">http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-pf/2007-May/003299.html</a></p>
<p>Step 1: Download GeoIP data.<br />
Step 2: Regex.<br />
Step 3: pfctl yourself some new tables into memory<br />
Step 4: Cronjob it<br />
Step 5: ???<br />
Step 6: Profit</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
